![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() |
|
|

|
I'm PayPal Verified |
|
|
I'm PayPal Verified |

|
1. The Pilates PilotWell, I hope I didn't bore you with this career talk. In any case, always do read what I say, even if it does bore you. It's the least you can do for me, Jen the Hen.
2. The Jews Stink - Mein Kampf
3. I'm Not Talking 'bout Me Leavin'
4. She Here?
You can put lipstick on Barack, but it's still Barack.They even displayed it on the screen, so the tv audience could read it. Thanks. I appreciate that.
Steve
Excuse me for saying so, but we'd like to see Jen play WITH herself.That's literally true. You can send me all the videos of that sort, that you want, Jen the Hen. You know where I'd like to post them.
Norm's, where life happens; life in prison, that is. That electrical crackle, in their commercial, is the electric chair. Norm's also has a death row. They're contracting the job. I just can't resist this one: If they make Charlie eat at Norm's all the time, what do you think's going to happen when he gets out of there? You can laugh now.I updated the techno-boredom item above, to draw your attention to a related item, I just wrote about, in today's Techno Blog entry. Don't miss this. It's worth the minute or so, to read it. I tell it straight.
Jennifer Aniston's sh----t !!!Lauren Sanchez seemed to be hinting that she read it, by the way she made a special mention of a Steve from Whittier, in giggly fashion. Then she said, "it's good?" Why, how could it not be good, considering? Doesn't she know? That might have been another hint that she was alluding to my message. I consider this a good night, considering these two developments.
Steve
I love this one of you, Jen. I've got an even better one of you, which I just put in my adult page, which shows about how you looked to me below, one of those nights in West Hollywood, in early 2005. You meant something, by the way you acted, the last time I saw you in West Hollywood? I want to talk to you, again.
I put this one here, of you in a maid outfit, because of a photo in a topless magazine, of the late 1950's. It had a black-and-white photo shoot of Sharon Tate with Voytek Frykowski. They spelled out their real names, just like I've written them here. Sharon wore a maid outfit of that approximate style. In one shot, she was topless and bending over, with her garters and panties facing the camera, and her boobs hanging downward. The article used the moniker, "Roy's toy," referring to Voytek's package. Sharon was still a minor then. I wish I still had that copy of the magazine. It'd be a true collector's item, today. I picked it up a few years before she died. I still suspect Max Bear Jr. to have a copy of it. If I ever talk to him, I want to ask him about it. I'd like to take scans of that whole article, with all the photos in that shoot. I wish I could remember the name of that magazine. I believe it was just a small publication. [NOTE: I suspect/believe that magazine was published in the Fullerton area. I also suspect/believe that shoot was done in the Palm Garden Apartments, in Fullerton (whatever those apartments were called then). I further suspect/believe that photo shoot was done in the second-floor unit, in the extreme northwest corner of that complex. I have a mysterious way of knowing such things. That issue of the magazine had a publication year of 1957 or 1958.]To C. Carcamo (who wrote the article about San Onofre),What do you think, Jen the Hen?
I've had long experience with nude beaches, in California. Black's Beach is a good case in point. Many years ago, I met an older man at Black's, who told me that beach has been used clothing-optional since the 1940's, and he was old enough to have experience there, that long ago. The point is that naturism is a proud tradition of freedom, that neither the DPR nor anyone else has the right to undo, with prudist human rights violation agenda. Nudity is truly a human right, which no man hath the right to take away with their sneak political agenda. It's the prude who is violent, not the naturist/nudist freedom lover. San Onofre is the same basic situation. They've had a good thing, and the political criminals are always on the lookout for a way to undo any progress that has been made in the direction of freedom. If you want to be technical, all nudity bans are unconstitutional. If one takes the time and effort to examine the issue objectively, one can't help but conclude that. The Huntington Beach city council passed a municipal ordinance, using unconstitutional reasoning. They figured that the police should be given free reign to decide anything and everything, but that's an unconstitutional policy, which violates the separation of the three branches of government. Neither the police, nor anyone pretending to be them, have the right to supercede the legislative branch of government. THEY ARE NOT THE "LAW," as some have described them. They must cease and desist from acting like they are.
Steve
Heeeeeeeerree's Heidi (Klum).
Here's a midsummer update on the poinsettia. Here it's freshly leafed out, awaiting Halloween, for the reddening of the bracts. This plant is an example of the success possible, in transplanting a store-bought Christmas item. It's clearly a mature well-established plant, now.I had a temporary job at a medical records place, some years ago. Some guy I worked with got on my case, all of a sudden, like he had it in for me. He challenged me to a fight outside, which I declined. We never made up.Thanks again, Maria. You've been coming through for me on the air.
Steve
Yes. I deserve one. I've been standing up to government's assault against personal liberties, in the U. S. The politicians need to be constantly told not to undo freedom in the U. S.Thanks Maria. You came through for me again. You have to admit; I have stood up to the politicians, to get them to back off of their oppressive ways.
Steve
Don't forget to wish me a happy birthday, Jen the Hen. It's the least you can do for me. My 50th birthday is Monday, the 28th. That means "tell me you wish me a happy birthday," too.It'd take the possibility of a good time, for me to want to risk my life. That's what it is with a dangerous pastime, or dangerous sport.There, I think I beat the clock this time, posting this email thing before midnight . . . Excuse me, but my clock struck midnight a second or two before I saved this last portion of this blog entry.
Steve
Potentially it's good, but it's something else with the potential to be abused by the dishonest. If the diners misreport the calorie counts, they are doing their customers a disservice, and possibly harming their health and making them fatter.I'm glad that they're back to reading a lot of my replies, again. Thanks, My13LA.
Steve
To all U. S. politicians, concerned with legislation of so-called "public health" issues:Maybe the politicians have been too embarrassed to stand up for the kind of human rights I've detailed above? I think their reasons are even less justifiable than that. They shouldn't be spoon-feeding the insurance companies kickbacks, by pretending human contact and relations to be safety violations. Likewise, they shouldn't be buying into medical industry, or "profession," propaganda. "Health" services are far less important than the "health" propaganda ministers would have you think. The poiticians shouldn't be acting like they have the right to dictate personal health choices to anyone and everyone. The salmonella issue, like all germ-related actions by the feds, is an absolute hoax. The feds responsible for that fraud ought to be fired on the spot, with no second chance, and no "explanations" accepted.
Apparently, all politicians, in the U. S., are my own children, whom I must lead around by the ear, to point out the facts of life to them. Can't you people stick to the honest facts, and not create oppressive rules, which take away the freedoms we, the people, are supposed to be entitled to?
I've kept my silence too long, on the produce recalls, which have insinuated that people can't be allowed the concession of the real truth, regarding so-called "public safety." The finding of salmonella on an item of produce does not justify a produce recall. Period. It's really basic. You politicians are trying to take away the freedom of interpersonal relations, which man has enjoyed since prehistoric times. You're insinuating that sex, and related interpersonal contact, which include contact with germs, to be undangering public health, and "consequently disallowed." That's utterly hypocritical of you, and you must immediately desist from making, or trying to make, normal healthy, personal-contact relationship details illegal. How people relate to each other is clearly none of your business. It is perfectly safe, and more healthy, to do all the personal attentions that lovers have done for each other, for countless thousands of years. Such details as rimming, and drinking urine, and even eating shit. That is all traditional and time-honored, within the human race, and even in the animal kingdom in general. You have no right to discontinue man's right to show affection to one another in such important, traditional and healthy ways. Politicians are obviously intending to make everything on earth illegal to the masses, while planning to sneak everything they want, behind people's backs. You are not entitled to your hypocrisy, and you are not entitled to legislate such matters, PERIOD.
Getting back to the produce recall issue, you are committing fraud, to say a recall to be warranted, because a speck of a germ were found on an item of produce. There are ALWAYS germs on everything, including produce, which it's normal practice to wash off, prior to consuming, and the fact that you are insinuating otherwise is a glaring testament to the fact that you are committing massive frauds against the public, and against human rights. You are not entitled to make health decisions for people. PERIOD. If you don't get with it, and desist from menacing the public with burdensome restrictions on lifestyle, you ought to be executed in public, to make an example out of you.
Furthermore, AIDS is an obnoxious oppressive myth, that you pseudo-heros have put on society. There is absolutely no such thing as AIDS, and anyone, including and especially you politicians, who furthers that myth, ought to be executed in public, to help set the record straight. Your lies are heinous, and I have no intention of letting you get away with "public health" m. o. bullying of the pubic.
Steve
This photo expresses my opinion of the Obama versus McCain issue. That's about how I feel about the late Sanford Meisner, too. I'd like to train a dog to pee on Meisner's grave this way, and take it for regular walks past Meisner's grave. Want a specific, of what I don't like about Obama? He supports the death penalty for sex offenders. That's a dishonest political position to occupy. For one thing, politicians think that can label anything they want as being "sex" or "violence." Just because they've labeled something "sex" or "violence," or "sex and violence," gives absolutely no clue whatsoever about whether or not the actual act involved either one of those things. Furthermore, just because a child doesn't have as good judgment as an adult, doesn't give the politician the real right to pretend, or define, what anything "constitutes," with regard to a child. The politicians are lying about "harming" minors. It's just silver-bullet dirty politics, and politicians aren't entitled to that. Show me a politician who harps constantly about "child molestation," and I'll show you a politician who's a crazy, mass-murderer political criminal. Politicians like that ought to be sent to prison, without the possibility of parole, or committed to mental institutions. They aren't competent to decide anything about anyone. I'm definitely not impressed by their pseudo-child-protection political stance. They're all madmen.I've encountered so many annoying people, in business situations, I can't easily narrow it down to the worst one. I wish I could be more specific.
Steve
There's an annual World Naked Bikeride event in Denver Colorado, on Saturday, July 12th. I wish I could be there. Help me to support this event and this cause. Madonna, that means "you too." I know you want to participate. Don't let your fans down; just your pants. This is worthwhile. Saturday is awfully near.NY Times: No. 1 Faux Pas in Washington? Candor, Perhaps.American politicians spew lies all day long, and never get nailed for it. It's when they tell their true beliefs that they get nailed in the media. The U. S. system is a totally dishonest inversion.
It was the journalist Michael Kinsley who changed Washington’s understanding of gaffes with his observation that they occur not when people lie, but when they say what they really think.
Yeah, I didn't vote in the 2000 election. Not voting against Al Gore has to be considered a crime, considering his heavy involvement in spreading the greenhouse gas myth.Thanks for reading my message, Susan. You stressed the word "myth," like you thought that to be an unusual opinion. Yes, the greenhouse gas theory IS a myth. Gore and his cohorts ought to be punished for their lies about the environment.
Steve
Fullerton
1. You probably wouldn't oblige me.Well, if you were nice, you'd help me out with the gas, if that was the only problem. I have an idea for a specialty of comedy, if I were to write for SNL. I don't want to give anyone the idea, by mentioning it. It has nothing to do with you or anyone I know. People have always stolen my good ideas out of my mind, without my even having writen or spoken the stuff. That's the kind of stiff competition that's been going on in the U. S.
2. It might tempt you to tell them to NEVER hire me.
3. It might jinx my chances of getting a job there, instead.
4. I can't afford the gas to commute that far.
I find so many items of interest, I haven't always mentioned everything I've come across. Here's something. I just mentioned, in yesterday's blog entry, that Houston is 1560 miles from Los Angeles. Well, just today I was reading a letter to Susan Atkins, that came from the mayor of Houston, in 2001. The coincidence is in the post office box number of the mayor's office. It's 1562, which is about that same number of miles, between L. A. and Houston. As proof, here's a copy of that letterhead, of the city of Houston, of 2001. What do you think? Uncanny?














|
